Best iTunes Review In A While
This just made me smile:

![in_these_troubled_times_tshirt-p235305226426509084t5gn_400[1] in_these_troubled_times_tshirt-p235305226426509084t5gn_400[1]](http://randydeluxe.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/in_these_troubled_times_tshirt-p235305226426509084t5gn_4001.jpg)
It was a world of fun:
Much love and thanks and hugs and fistjabbery to Tom Merritt and Jason Howell, two of the best guys in the business.

If there is any large category of iTunes offerings that are the most underrepresented by the iTunes Essentials system, it’s comedy. Currently, I can easily locate exactly two iTunes essentials general comedy lists among the thousands of pro lists. Contrast that with the mountain of comedy available on iTunes, and there is a gap to fill.
But rather than just point you at the best comedy tracks you can buy, I’d like to save you some money. I’ve been a connoisseur of stand-up comedy for 25 years now, and have collected and listened-to hundreds of comedy albums. There’s a difficult issue with buying comedy in iTunes: Most albums are divided up into 15 tracks or more. At the usual price of $0.99 per track in iTunes, buying a couple of hours of comedy could be prohibitively expensive. In some per-track collections, you’d run up a tab of over $50/hour to listen to your favorite comedians tell jokes.
But there is an obvious alternative, and that is to buy comedy in iTunes by the whole album. To take the number one Essentials example below, purchasing all of Feelin’ Kinda Patton by the track would cost you a total of $27.72. If you only really wanted to own half of the tracks on that album, it would run you $13.86. But here’s the deal: You can buy the whole album right now for $7.99.
If you love comedy, purchasing whole albums in iTunes is the way to go. But there are not yet any whole-album-save-you-money iTunes Essentials lists in the store. I can’t even see a way to create a user-list that points at whole albums, rather than single tracks.
So let’s get on with the best comedy albums in iTunes, for the money:
The Basics
Next Steps
Deep Cuts
Note: Comedy albums by the following artists are not available for purchase in iTunes: Richard Pryor, Richard Jeni, Roseanne Barr, Jim Norton or Vaughn Meader’s First Family (the highest selling comedy album of all time).
P.S. I love Katt Williams, but this is the worst value in all of comedy. Cut that thing down by 80% at least!

I know what you’re thinking.
Of course iTunes has an Essentials listing for Aerosmith.
No, they don’t.
But, they’re the best selling American hard rock band of all time! They have 150 tracks in iTunes!
Still, there is no iTunes Essentials listing for Aerosmith. This is because only half of Aerosmith’s catalog is available in iTunes. Aerosmith changed labels a couple of times, and were left with no relationship with the party that owns the rights to sell their first few albums. Those are available on Amazon, but only as complete albums. The iTunes Essentials team at Apple doesn’t want to classify Aerosmith’s best songs without the ability to promote half of them, or worse, by pointing to live versions of those songs that upset customers who think they’re getting the originals. But that won’t stop me!
With over 150 million albums sold, 21 top forty hits and, 9 number one hits and four Grammys, Aerosmith was a shoe-in for the Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame, which inducted them in 2001. Their success speaks for itself, and it baffles me as to why iTunes can’t just contain all their songs and promote them like I’m about to. Essentials represents the starting point for collectors, as well as a concentration of the best for those who already have most everything. This list covers 40 years of music:
The Basics
Next Steps
Deep Cuts
It’s amazing – with the blink of an eye, you finally see the light. It’s amazing – when the moment arrives that you know you’ll be all right. It’s amazing, and I’m saying a prayer for the desperate hearts tonight.
Good night!
Have you ever noticed this in iTunes?

It’s a link to an entire area feature of iTunes that helps you discover an artist or sound or style of music. It’s also a unique free service that has caused many to practically depend on it. Simply put, if there is an artist that you think you like, but you don’t really know which of their songs to buy, iTunes Essentials gives you an introduction to that artist that goes right to the best songs by that artist. The iTunes Essentials editor divides up that artist’s most endearing songs into layers, with the first being called “The Basics”, the second is labeled “Next Steps” and then a third level of songs, “Deep Cuts”. Each layer contains 12-15 songs, which is perfect for burning to a CD if you still use such things.
For artists that have fewer than, say, 25 songs that the iTunes Essentials editor is willing to recommend strongly, she drops one of the levels. For example, 3 Doors Down in iTunes Essentials only has “The Basics” and “Next Steps”.
What occurred to me about iTunes Essentials, as I fell in love with it over the past few months, is that it can’t just be an automatic thing. iTunes can’t just rank an artist’s songs based on their popularity in iTunes and then divvy them up like this. Rather, an actual person who knows the catalog has to devote time to determining which songs to present. There are just too many factors to consider. You’ve got people from all over the world who come along and think to themselves:
I have an idea that I might really like this artist, but I don’t know his catalog, and I don’t know which of his songs to collect first.
If iTunes just left that up to everyone else, they would not get the best results.But here’s the problem – a world of people are accessing iTunes right now, looking for Essentials lists for artists that have a lot of really good music in iTunes, and finding nothing. I’ve decided to help out. Perhaps you came to this blog post looking specifically for this. If so, I hope you like my suggestions. Perhaps iTunes will make an Essentials list of their own for this artist in the future. If so, it will be fun to compare my list to theirs.
Toto had a 31 year run, during which they released 17 albums, and sold more than 30 million records. They ostensibly broke up in 2008, but leave behind a legacy of worldwide success that few artists can claim. It is inexplicable that iTunes does not yet have a Toto Essentials page.
The Basics
Next Steps
Deep Cuts
Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Complaints? Feel free to leave them here!
I got to sit and watch the last 20 minutes of Cloverfield just now. When I originally joined a packed house to see it on opening night, some combination of the hot dogs (with jalapenos) that I had just eaten and the choice to sit near the front of the theater precluded me from, well, making it through the whole film. It’s a handicam film, and that means that the video frame moves around quite a bit.
I was hesitant to review the film before I had seen the whole thing. I have a long-standing belief that the quality of a movie is a constant – that if you’re offended by the first third of a movie, you aren’t likely to find the last 2/3 very appealing, either. In films where there is lots of action, it is quite typically spread out throughout the film. So with Cloverfield, I had originally seen enough of the film to pass personal judgment. But writing a review and talking about a movie publicly requires more care. There are exceptions to the consistency rule. I’m sure that I will see a film some day where I am bored-to-tears for 98% of the duration and then ripped to the edge of my seat at the very end.
Thinking of The Sixth Sense, perhaps? I ruined that film’s twist by leaning over to my wife about 15 minutes along and speculating “Wouldn’t it be cool if…” and my speculation was the exact twist ending.
But Cloverfield, if anything, is a movie that builds excitement as it goes. The initial premise is this – the audience are all being allowed to see footage recovered from a spectacular event. The footage was taken by persons who were on the scene. The scene is New York City. The footage is entirely contained on one tape. It is not congruous.
And therein lies the clever bit in Cloverfield. It’s hard to explain, but I’ll try:
Imagine that you and I had a video camera and we recorded various parts of a day we spent together. Let’s say that we got 80 minutes of footage all together, spread out over most of the day. Now imagine that the tape is rewound in the camera, and then we watch a few minutes, and then the camera is accidentally handed over to someone else, who sets out to document other events. Well – there goes our previous recording. Except that this third person stops every now and then and fast-forwards the tape a few seconds before he continues his filming. Now what have you got?
If we did this in real-life, without any planning, you’d have a mess. But if it was scripted just so… it might be the most magical voyeurism around.
Cloverfield was written by Drew Goddard, who also wrote several episodes of both J.J. Abrahms’ television shows (Alias, Lost) and Joss Whedon’s (Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Angel). Goddard has no small task. Unlike most scripts, he does not get to write straight, trade-off dialogue here. Instead, the dialogue takes a back seat to the purpose of each line delivered. Handicam or no, excellent sound effects or no, the realism of Cloverfield depends almost entirely on the script telling the actors what to do. What they say is almost lost in the din of haste to run for our lives that constitutes the movie, once it gets going.
And let’s not overlook the sounds of Cloverfield. Of course, we are amazed by how seamlessly New York City can be destroyed all around actors nowadays (witness I Am Legend), but the grandeur that is modern CG-visual green-screen super-double-throwdown fakery would be undermined in one second if not for sound effects being proper, and Cloverfield deserves an Oscar for sound. I hope that it is remembered a year from now. Note that the entire narrative is captured by a single handicam, so the only music in the movie is that which the handicam’s microphone encounters during one scene. Music often takes some of the load from the shoulders of sound engineers – mistakes can go unnoticed by the listener, whose ear is busy with an orchestral score. Not so in Cloverfield. In many scenes, the lack of score heightens the terror much more than screeching violins could have.
The in-front-of-camera acting is mostly handled by Lizzy Caplan, Jessica Lucas and Michael Stahl-David, who plays the leader-of-the-pack, Rob. This is really Stahl-David’s first major movie role, to which he graduated from a leading role in the short-lived television drama The Black Donnellys. He does an excellent job of keeping the continuity of the character, which cannot be easy when filming takes place over days and weeks.
J.J. Abrahms, of course, is the defining personality of Cloverfield, and it resembles his most major work – television’s Lost – in several ways, the primary of which is a willingness to leave all which is unseen by the camera unknown. This is not an absolute. In one scene that drew gasps from the audience, the camera is taken into a television shop and pointed at a newscast. This essentially gave the movie a second camera for a moment, and was a trick that was not overused. Abrahms and Goddard are happy to leave the audience wanting more, and in some cases – such as a clear understanding of exactly what it is making all that noise – much more. In our screening of the movie, many in the audience were demonstrably upset when the credits began to roll. Their complaint was that too many questions had been asked and not answered.
I believe that, if this is an issue, then it is a risk that you take when you go to the movies. I knew one person (perhaps the only one in the world) who knew nothing about The Fellowship Of The Ring when she went to see the film. Afterwards, she was quite frustrated that “it didn’t have an ending.” This has never been an issue for me, even when I was expecting a different ending to a film than was delivered. In particular, with what some call “hyper-realistic” movies such as Cloverfield, the less unlikely the ending, the better. In overly-contrived drama, we often get (and have come to expect) a huge spider web of events to lead to an unforeseen conclusion, or a conclusion through which we get a very high amount of closure. In reality, there is little closure, and Cloverfield’s ending is exactly the sort of punctuation mark that reality would have, were it being viewed on the big-screen.
I give Cloverfield an A-, or an 8 out of 10. My hope is that its success doesn’t spawn a rash of single-hand-camera gimmick movies, because that is a very difficult method to pull off, and it could never be used as a crutch. If for no other reason, think of the jalapeno hot dog eating public!